Pages

True Stories: 8 Eye Openers regarding Vaccine Safety

1)  Dr Poul Thorsen
Danish researcher on the OIG's most wanted fugitive felons list.  Indicted on 22 counts of money laundering and wire fraud.  In short, stole over 2 millions dollars in research money while conducting vaccine research for CDC.
https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/fugitives/profiles.asp
Significant because:
-He is the lead researcher for 21 of the 24 vaccine studies currently in use by the CDC.
-The CDC has not reviewed or retracted these studies.
For fact check, this is a video of Dr Boyle, president of CDC, testifying before Congress:
https://youtu.be/ps98Fk6HIJs?si=_-vhRuKwWKM2d6lN
(Fwd to minute 14 and then min 24 for Poul Thorsen)
* Incase you didn't catch that- We are relying on a convicted felon (WANTED FOR FRAUD) for our children's safety.  Shouldn't the CDC retract these studies until they can be reviewed for accuracy?  Why isn't this in the media?  Wouldn't it help find him?

2) H.R. 1757
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1757/text
Is the vaccine schedule safe?  We don't know.
There is no study comparing the health of vaccinated verses unvaccinated children in the U.S. and the CDC refuses to conduct one.  A Bill has been introduced to Congress that would require the CDC to commission such a study by an unbiased source.  It has less than 5% chance of passing.

Parents want this because it is the only way to know the overall impact of the vaccine schedule as a whole.  There are no other studies that look at the impact or safety of the entire schedule.

Clear statistics would shut down the autism vaccine link once and for all.  So why wont the CDC do it?  What about other concerns:  SIDS, ADHD, asthma, allergies, cancer, etc.  How do the rates compare?  We don't know.  And we are not about to find out. Why?

3)  The Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
This law shielded drug companies from being sued for damages caused by a vaccine on the routine childhood vaccine schedule.  Tax payers provide their attorney.   Drug company representatives don't even have to show up.
Since 1986, the CDC toddler vaccine schedule has grown from 10 to 36 "liability free" vaccines which can be mandated in all 50 states.    What was the likely reason for this increase?  Do you recall any mass epidemics that necessitated this change? 
Here's a great video that explains:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6S1-LgYyjQg
Note: Autism rates went from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 86 during this same time. 

4) The Verstraeten Study 2/29/00.
Now here's the bomb dropping, so please pay attention to this one.
The only large scale epidemiological study using American data that has been conducted by the CDC revealed a clear link between thimerosal in vaccines and autism.
And they never released it.
Instead, that's when Dr Fugitive (Poul Thorsen) enters the picture.
The study became public through the Freedom of Information Act.
Here it is:
http://www.autismhelpforyou.com/EXPERT%20PAPER%20-%20Thimerosal%20VSD%20study001%20-%20Internet%20File.pdf

5) Simpsonwood Meetings
Secret meeting held to discuss the findings of Verstraeten study.  Included leaders from World Health Organization, American Pediatric Association, the CDC and executives from all drug companies. It was illegal to hold this meeting out of public eye.  The transcripts became available thanks to the Freedom of Information Act.  You can read the entire 262 page transcripts here:
http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/2.9.pdf
Sample quote:
"the number of dose related relationships [between mercury and autism] are linear and statistically significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear. They are statistically significant." - Dr. William Weil, American Academy of Pediatrics. Simpsonwood, GA, June 7, 2000

I highly recommend this article written by Robert Kennedy Jr and published in Rolling Stone.  I would offer the Rolling Stone link but you have to pay the subscription to view it.
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/kennedy.html

This page contains more information including links to recovered emails (freedom of information act) between Dr Boyle and Verstraeten attempting to alter results during the study.  Dr Boyle was caught red handed and yet was promoted to president of the CDC. 
http://www.putchildrenfirst.org./chapter2.html

6)  Professor John Walker-Smith
Co-Author with Dr Wakefield in the (retracted) Lancet Study that suggested a link between MMR and autism.  What is not known is that Professor John Walker-Smith has since filed and won his appeal.  He has been fully exonerated.  This would not have happened if there was anything fraudulent in the study. 

Professor John Walker-Smith is known as the father of gastroenterology and world renown.  He is now retired.  The report was important because in it, Professor John Walker-Smith identified an entirely new bowel disease which he termed Autistic Enterocolitis.   Dr Wakefield has not filed an appeal but is considered heroic among the autism community.   He has been healing children of this disease through a center in Austen. You can find many videos of Dr Wakefield defending his research and the parents of the vaccine injured on YouTube.  Pick one.

7)  Dr Arthur Krigsman
Others have repeated the Wakefield findings but Krigsman did it in a way that can not and has not been refuted.  The best way to understand is to watch this short clip:
https://youtu.be/_U1ixlKvfEc?si=jAYRbSNGqr8X_Mpe
You can read the full study here:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058058

This work, which has been kept away from mainstream, is so very important because it suggest regressive autism is treatable.  Many children have made tremendous progress if not un-diagnosed once their bowel symptoms are healed.  At minimum their biopsies reveal a child in tremendous pain who has lost the ability to communicate.  This could explain a lot of autistic behavior.
https://youtu.be/IgXUifU3is8?si=JEhfrPDdmx3e3r66

8)  Jenny McCarthy
Known as the leader of the 'anti-vaxer' movement.  There is no such thing as an 'anti vaxer'.  I hope you will now see that the people known as 'anti-vaxers' are really just the parents of the vaccine injured coming forward.  The movement is about demanding safe, effective vaccines and addressing the problems above. 

If a person has questions about vaccine safety, it doesn't mean they are anti vaccine.  It means they have questions about vaccine safety.  Why are we so conditioned to accept without question and lash out at those who ask?

This is a powerful video of Jenny McCarthy and what the movement is really about. 
Please watch before spreading anymore 'anti-vaxer' propaganda:
http://vimeo.com/m/29349428